Was Adam the first human?

Kevin deYoung ‘s post on 10 reasons to believe in a historical Adam has attracted a good deal of attention on the web in the last few days. The comments that follow the article often point to the main reason not to believe in  a historical Adam. It is impossible.

Let me soften that a little. It is impossible that Adam was the first human being ever to exist. But possibly there was an Adam somewhere among the ancestors of ancient Israel. Genesis 5:1 says, “This is the book of the generations of Adam.” It is possible that there was such a book and that it was a source for Genesis. But this Adam would have existed way down the line of human evolution.

In my relatively conservative undergraduate school, one of my professors raised the possibility that the “Bible doesn’t say Adam was the first man; it says he was the first man to till the soil.” You could try to associate Adam with the beginnings of agriculture.

But I don’t see any reason even to be that literal. It is clear to me that the real reason many find it hard to accept DNA evidence, fossil evidence, the history of populations, and the history of language–all of which contradict an Adam-as-the-first-human scenario–is that it goes against Augustinian and Reformed interpretations of Paul. These are deYoung’s reasons 9 and 10. If it was just about the interpretation of Genesis, I don’t think there would be a problem. But it is about the interpretation of Romans 5.

Jerome’s Latin translation of Roman’s 5:12 was wrong. He translated it to say that we all sinned in Adam. In fact it says that sin came into the world through Adam, which is a little different. Verse 14 says that Adam was a type (tupos), so I don’t think Paul requires us to take Adam literally. Maybe we are each our own Adam. Gustav Wingren, a Swedish theologian, had a profound interpretation of human life along these lines.

But Western Christian theology often went with Jerome’s mistranslation (the Eastern Church, of course, did not derive doctrine from a Latin translation, and so has a different understanding). Augustine thought that we all sinned in Adam because we were all present “in Adam’s loins”. And Reformed theology thought that we all sinned in Adam because Adam was the federal head of the human race. He somehow represented us all. Many in the Reformed tradition have interpreted Romans 5 through this Covenant Theology, sometimes called Federal Theology. Some of them think it all falls apart if there wasn’t an Adam who was the first human being who ever lived. They think his nonexistence undermines Christ as the second Adam and endangers their whole understanding of the plan of salvation.

I have run into people who claimed that 1Corinthians 15:45 plainly says that Adam was the first man. But does it really? “So also it is written, ‘The first man, Adam, became a living person‘; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit” (NET Bible). The most important point is that Jesus is the last Adam, but Jesus is not the last human who ever lived. So why does Adam have to be the first human who ever lived?

Advertisements

About theoutwardquest

I have many interests, but will blog mostly about what I read in the fields of Bible and religion.
This entry was posted in Theology and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Was Adam the first human?

  1. Good post. I’ve commented a bit on my blog about this topic, so feel free to check that out if you like. I’d love to hear some of your thoughts on the questions I try to raise.

    Timothy Michael Law also responded to some of these issues, particularly how salvation (and the reliability of Paul, and the reliability of Jesus, and the institution of marriage, and all sorts of other categories that have nothing at all to do with Genesis) is at risk if Adam did not exist somewhere in history. Check out my link to his blog as well, if you have time!

  2. Pingback: Paul the resurrection as event | theoutwardquest

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s